JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 7, 2011

A- de 2011

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Iván Palacio Palacio

✓Claimant Roberto Augusto Bernal Nigrinis·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Aclaracion Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Declaración de inexequibilidad en sentencia C-113/93
  • Procedencia sólo respecto de frases o conceptos de la parte resolutiva o cuando lo expuesto en la parte motiva influya en ella
Fallo De Revision De Tutela
  • Improcedencia de aclaración, corrección o adición
Accion De Tutela Contra Cooperativa De Trabajadores De Colombia
  • Denegar solicitud de aclaración de sentencia T-467/10 por extemporánea
4 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de Aclaración Sentencia.

El peticionario requiere que la Corporación emita pronunciamiento acerca de los alcances de la sentencia T-467/10, para poder comprender con total claridad si se ha dado cumplimiento al fallo en debida forma o no.

Para la Sala, la solicitud fue presentada de forma extemporánea y en tal sentido DENIEGA la solicitud impetrada.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. DENEGAR la solicitud de aclaracion de la sentencia T-467 de 2010, proferida por la Sala Quinta de Revision el 16 de junio del mismo ano.
  2. Segundo. INFORMAR al interesado que contra el presente auto no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.